The fuel price adjustment case was heard in the Supreme Court.
Fuel price adjustment case: Chief Justice reprimands lawyers of distribution companies
Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faiz Isa reprimanded the lawyer of the distribution companies during the hearing of the fuel price adjustment case.
The fuel price adjustment case was heard in the Supreme Court.
During the hearing, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa remarked that more than 1,000 appeals were filed against the decision of the High Court. would have told before, during the case, it is not an easy task to remove the request of this number from more than a thousand requests, professionalism has almost ended, they will come to the rostrum and give speeches.
The Chief Justice inquired whether there is any objection to the admissibility of an appeal. If no one has any objection then give arguments on merit, there is not even one plea in the appeals, different pleas have been made.
The attorney general said that lawyer Manoor Salam will present arguments on behalf of the distribution companies, advocate Umar Aslam is representing Nepra, court support and the federation will be represented by the attorney general's office.
Request for supply of details of Supreme Court employees approved
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has accepted the request to provide the details of its employees under the Right to Information Act.
The court ordered the registrar's office to provide the information of the Supreme Court employees within 7 days.
The Supreme Court ordered that the Registrar Supreme Court should provide the information to the petitioner within 7 days.
Justice Athar Minullah has also written an additional note in the judgment.
In the decision, the Supreme Court has said that the Right to Information Act does not apply to the Supreme Court, access to information is the right of citizens under Article 19A.
The Supreme Court has said in the decision that it is necessary for the person requesting the information to give reasons, the applicant should be refunded the fee deposited for the intra-court appeal and the appeal in the Supreme Court, and the decision should also be issued in Urdu. Ga, the information provider is obliged to evaluate the reasons.
It should be noted that the Supreme Court reserved its decision on September 27 after listening to the arguments of the petitioner Mukhtar Ahmed and the Attorney General.
Mukhtar Ahmed had approached the Registrar Supreme Court for the details of the Supreme Court employees, the former Registrar Supreme Court had refused to provide the details.
The petitioner had approached the Information Commission, on which the Information Commission asked the then Registrar Supreme Court to provide the information
The Registrar Supreme Court had approached the Islamabad High Court against the decision of the Information Commission.
Also read this:
European Commission to increase the humanitarian aid to Gaza
0 Comments